Skip to content

Exynos 9610 vs Snapdragon 845

Flagship smartphones are the most expensive, feature top of line spec sheets, boast great cameras, and are the most desirable smartphones out there. However, it is what lies under the skin that makes them flagships –the chipset.

There are many chipset manufacturers out there that offer chipsets at varying levels of the smartphone pyramid. And the king of the chipset kingdom is none other than Qualcomm. They supply not only flagship but mid-level chipsets, to all the Android smartphone giants like Samsung, One Plus.

Samsung quite undeniably the biggest smartphone manufacturer in the world also manufactures a chipset of its own going by the name — Exynos. Although it features the Snapdragon chipset in its devices as well, it also includes the Exynos in some batches, depending on the region.

Qualcomm launched the Snapdragon 845, in the year 2017 and it first debuted in the Samsung Galaxy S9 series. Samsung introduced its Exynos 9610 chipset with the launch of the Galaxy A50 in June last year. So we’ve pitted the two chipsets to see how they stack up against each other.

Semiconductor Size

The size of semiconductor is crucial, and manufacturers strive to develop smaller semiconductors, as they offer better performance and reduced levels of power consumption. 

In terms of semiconductor size, both the Snapdragon 845 and the Exynos 9610 are fabricated using Samsung’s 10nm LPP process and 10nm FinFet processes, respectively. 

Hence they exhibit similar levels of performance and power consumption, as a result of being built on the same architecture.

Also read: Exynos 9610 vs Snapdragon 675 vs Helio P70


The 9610 features eight cores consisting of four Cortex-A73 big cores operating at up to 2.3GHz and four Cortex-A53 little cores operating at up to 1.6GHz. 

The 845, on the other hand, features four Kryo 385 Silver high-efficiency cores operating at 1.7GHz along with four high-performance Kryo 385 Gold cores operating at 2.8GHz.

The higher clock speeds of the 845 speak for themselves, and thus the 845 offers 17.18% faster CPU speed than that of the 9610.


The Snapdragon 845 features an Adreno 630 GPU while the Exynos settles for the Mali-G72 MP3 GPU. 

In terms of RAM requirements both use LPDDR4X RAM type. However, the Snapdragon has a higher RAM speed of 1866MHz with support for up to 8GB of RAM compared to the Exynos, which has a speed of 1600MHz with support for up to 6 GB of RAM.

The faster RAM speed results in quicker performance giving the 845 the edge in this regard.

Also read: Kirin 710 vs Snapdragon 660

Benchmark (Antutu )

The Snapdragon 845 returned a score of 264823(Samsung Galaxy S9+) while the Exynos returned a benchmark score of 151136 ( Samsung Galaxy A50) on the Antutu listing. Clearly, the 845 is the more superior chipset a result of having higher clock speeds. 


Exynos 9610 has support for a single 24MP rear camera or dual 16MP+16MP rear cameras, and a single 24MP or dual 16MP+16MP front cameras. 

The Snapdragon 845 has support for a single 32MP or dual 16MP+16MP rear cameras, and the same goes for the front camera support.


Both these chipsets feature similar specs in most regards. Additionally, the Snapdragon also features out-of-order execution which is used in CPUs to make use of instruction cycles that would usually be wasted due to delays.

Thus the Snapdragon 845 with is faster CPU and RAM speed along with support for an addition 2 GB of RAM over the 9610, comes out as the winner of this battle.

Category Exynos 9610 Snapdragon 845
CPU Up to 2.3GHz Quad-core (Cortex-A73) +
Up to 1.7GHz Quad-core (Cortex-A53)
Qualcomm Kryo 385 CPU; Octa-core CPU; CPU Speed: upto 2.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G72 MP3 Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
Benchmark Scores 151136 ( Samsung Galaxy A50) 264823(Samsung Galaxy S9+)
Camera Rear: 24MP, Front: 24MP,
Dual Camera: 16+16MP
Dual Camera: 16 + 16 MP; Single Camera (60 fps): upto 16 MP: Single Camera (30 fps): upto 32 MP
Memory LPDDR4x LPDDR4x
Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 5.0
Display WQXGA (2560×1600) 4K Ultra HD

Also read: Snapdragon 865 5G vs 855+ vs 855: 4 talking points

Hello There!

If you like what you read, please support our publication by sharing it with your friends, family and colleagues. If you're running an Adblocker, we humbly request you to whitelist us.

Share on facebook
Share on whatsapp
Share on twitter
Share on reddit
Share on linkedin
Share on pocket
Share on pinterest
Share on telegram
Share on stumbleupon
Share on digg
Share on tumblr
Share on email
Share on delicious
Share on skype